Categories
ImmPulse™ Newsletter

Canada Removing Visa Requirement for Citizens of the United Arab Emirates

Effective June 5, 2018, citizens of the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.) will no longer require a visa to travel to Canada.

Like almost all other non-visa nationals (the most notable exception being U.S. citizens), U.A.E. citizens will require only an Electronic Travel Authorization (eTA) before flying to Canada, once the change comes into effect.

This removal of the visa requirement does not change any other considerations concerning temporary entry such as whether a work permit is required in a particular case, and issues of inadmissibility.

The information in this article is for general purposes only, and not intended as legal advice for any particular situation.

 

Categories
ImmPulse™ Newsletter

Global Talent Stream Update – Innovative Organizations (Category A) Seeking Additional Employees

The Global Talent Stream (GTS) is a valuable tool that allows employers to expedite the hiring of foreign workers where the employer can show that either:

  • They are an ‘innovative’ organization (Category A), or
  • They are hiring for a position which falls in a prescribed list of high-tech occupations (Category B).

For the purposes of Category A, an employer needs to seek approval from a designated organization to which it substantiates its claim, based on relevant criteria. Among the criteria in this regard are requirements that the position in question for which hiring is proposed be at a salary of a minimum of $80,000CDN per year.

Also for the purposes of Category A, it is anticipated that an employer would perhaps be needing one or two positions filled. However, the government of Canada has now clarified that where a Category A employer seeks to fill positions beyond two, additional requirements must be met, including:

  • Benchmarks for high growth as either
    • Average annualized growth rates in revenue greater than 20% per year, over a three-year period, and with 10 or more employees at the beginning of the period, or
    • Average annualized growth rates in job creation in Canada greater than 20% per year over a three-year period, and with 10 or more employees at the beginning of the period
  • Positions would need to be paid at a minimum of $150,000CDN per year.

Clearly, organizations seeking to be ‘certified’ as Category A organizations, and who may wish to hire more than two people under the GTS should be aware of these updated requirements.

The information in this article is for general purposes only, and not intended as legal advice for any particular situation.

Categories
ImmPulse™ Newsletter

Canadian Biometrics Requirements to be Expanded

Background

As noted in a prior issue of ImmPulse™, Canada was at some point in the future to broaden the list of people who would require biometrics to enter Canada. Until now, the requirement has only been placed on nationals of a few countries (which can be determined at http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/visit/biometrics.asp; examples include Algeria, Bangaldesh, and Iraq, to name just a few).

What’s Changed

Effective July 31, 2018, biometrics will now be required for various classes of people seeking to enter or travel to Canada, subject to a few exceptions to be set out below. The following categories of people will need biometrics:

  • Those seeking visitor visas (i.e. at a visa post)
  • Those seeking work or study permits (whether at a visa post or port of entry)
  • Those seeking permanent residence, and
  • Those seeking refugee or asylum status.

There are, however, a number of exemptions from the need for biometrics.

  • Canadian citizens, citizenship applicants (including passport applicants), or existing permanent residents
  • children under the age of 14
  • applicants over the age of 79 (there is no upper age exemption for asylum claimants)
  • visa-exempt nationals coming to Canada as tourists who hold a valid Electronic Travel Authorization (eTA)
  • heads of state and heads of government
  • cabinet ministers and accredited diplomats of other countries and the United Nations, coming to Canada on official business
  • S. visa holders transiting through Canada
  • refugee claimants or protected persons who have already provided biometrics and are applying for a study or work permit
  • temporary resident applicants who have already provided biometrics in support of a permanent resident application that is still in progress

In addition, for now, those applying for any kind of immigration status/document from within Canada are currently exempted, but it is expected that eventually, various forms of inland applications will also give rise to the need for biometrics.

Provision of biometric information is required only once every 10 years, so subsequent types of applications, during a ten year period since the initial biometrics were granted, will not garner the need for provision of further biometrics.

What You Should Do

Any applicant, employer, or other party who may be involved in the immigration process should be aware of the foregoing, and should take action to ensure compliance. There are procedures to be followed to seek biometrics (whether at a visa post or port of entry), and applicants will need to ensure that those procedures are followed.

The information in this article is for general purposes only, and not intended as legal advice for any particular situation.

Categories
ImmPulse™ Newsletter

Changes to Canada’s Medical Inadmissibility Provisions

Though details are not yet fully defined, and though this appears to be a stepping stone toward even bigger changes on the issue, the Canadian government is easing considerations with regard to inadmissibility for people with medical issues. Please note that medical inadmissibility can impact immigration matters whether the matter concerns a principal applicant or an accompanying dependent, and whether entry is for temporary or permanent residence.

Outside of various issues that relate to medical inadmissibility such as issues concerning people who may pose a risk to Canadian safety or public health, and exceptions for certain classes of immigrants (e.g. sponsored spouses), Canadian law sets thresholds for people who have medical concerns, or who may require access to Canadian social services, based on economic factors. The basic principle is that a person may be medically inadmissible if they are expected to cost the system more than the average cost of a Canadian per year (over a five year period). The most recent estimate in this regard is $6,655/year.

The government announced today that:

  • The threshold for determining the burden that a prospective immigrant (temporary or permanent) might have on the Canadian health care system is being raised from the $6,655 per year threshold noted, to triple that, being just under $20,000, and
  • It is amending the definition of social services by removing references to special education, social and vocational rehabilitation services and personal support services. This will remove such costs from the calculation of ‘excessive demand’, obviously easing concerns where such services may be required.
  • All medical inadmissibility determinations will be centralized in one office, hopefully leading to more consistent analysis.

There are ongoing discussions with provinces (who are responsible for health and social service systems in Canada), and further changes are expected. We will of course advise of any important new updates that may impact ongoing medical inadmissibility considerations, as they are announced.

The information in this article is for general purposes only, and not intended as legal advice for any particular situation.

Categories
ImmPulse™ Newsletter

Check Your LMIA Advertizing – Indeed and Workopolis are Merging!

Background

The process for an employer in Canada to seek government permission to hire a foreign worker is known as a Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) application. These applications are processed by the government agency known as Service Canada.

Within this process, Canadian employers must typically first show that they have carried out certain minimum recruitment requirements. Among other criteria, ads must be placed in two separate sources (plus the Canadian job bank), for four weeks in the three month period preceding the application.

What is Changing

Two of the more popular job search web sites that are used for this purpose are (a) Indeed.com (operating in Canada as Indeed.ca) and (b) Workopolis.com.

It has been announced that Indeed (through its parent company) has purchased Workopolis. According to a pronouncement on the Workopolis home page, Indeed “will operate Workopolis.com as part of its publisher network. The site will continue to operate in a similar manner”.

It would appear as well, that this change will take effect as of April 11, 2018 (as Workopolis is advising candidates to download their resumes by that date, or they will become unavailable).

Impact

Though how this will be viewed by Service Canada is not certain, employers who are currently advertizing on both Indeed and Workopolis in anticipation of a LMIA application, must be aware of, and prepared for, the possibility that, their two sources of advertizing will be considered as one – and as such, that that they will not have met the ‘two source’ recruitment guideline.

What Employers Need to Do

As noted, it is not fully clear how Service Canada will treat LMIA applications that show Workopolis and Indeed as the two advertizing sources, but the most cautious approach for any currently running ads would be to advertise as well on a separate source, even if this sets the advertizing time frame back for a short period.

Certainly, moving forward, new ads in support of LMIA applications should be placed on two distinct sites, and this would presumably mean that Workopolis (as the ‘subsumed’ site) is no longer a viable choice for this purpose, or at the very least, that this would be taking an unnecessary risk in the LMIA process.

The information in this article is for general purposes only, and not intended as legal advice for any particular situation.

Categories
ImmPulse™ Newsletter

Canada Offers Further Immigration Options Under the New Trans-Pacific Partnership Free Trade Agreement

In its ongoing expansion of free trade, Canada is set to launch a new chapter on March 8, entering into the ‘Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP – a variation on the original TPP which faltered when the United States declined to participate). This free trade agreement’s members are:

  • Australia
  • Brunei
  • Canada
  • Chile
  • Japan
  • Malaysia
  • Mexico
  • New Zealand
  • Peru
  • Singapore
  • Vietnam

This agreement is of course is in addition to the Canada-European Union Free Trade Agreement, which launched just a few months ago, and a number of other free trade agreements which Canada maintains.

In addition to other elements of free trade, the CPTPP provides for eased immigration provisions for nationals of member countries into Canada (and reciprocally to the other jurisdictions). These provisions provide primarily for work or business visitation under certain circumstances, where otherwise, some form of labour market impact assessment, or labour certification, would have been required.

Here is a sampling of some CPTPP provisions for member country citizens seeking work permits or business related entry into Canada:

  • Business Visitors:
    • Includes ‘Service Sales Persons’ which appears to allow for entry of business visitors to carry out service or sales activity even beyond the ordinary ‘after-sales’ allowances which typically require that the service to be provided is pursuant to a commitment made in an initial purchase/lease.
  • Intra-Company Transferees
    • Includes Management Trainees
    • Allows ‘specialists’ to have ‘specialized knowledge of company’s products or service and their application in international markets’, OR ‘an advanced level of expertise or knowledge of the company’s processes and procedures’. This seems to open the door to allow for a broader range of ‘specialist’ than the standard intra-company provisions which typically require proprietary knowledge AND advanced experience.
    • (Note that Malaysia, Singapore and Vietnam are excluded for the purpose of ‘specialists’)
  • Professionals
    • This category includes professionals and technicians, but there are unique categories of occupations based on the reciprocal situation with each country.
    • Professionals require educational requirements as set out in the NOC for that occupation, along with 2 years of experience, and remuneration ‘at a level consummate with other similarly-qualified professionals within the industry in the region where the work is performed’. It is not clear that this is limited to Job Bank based median wage estimates, as is typically otherwise required.
    • Technicians have similar requirements, but need 4 years of work experience.
    • As noted, there are unique occupational categories, too extensive to set out here, but certainly, there is a wide variety of potential for professionals and technicians from member countries.

Of course, much of the above is still open to interpretation, and it is far too early to assess the impact of the new CPTPP on immigration issues, (notably work permit allowances), but certainly, it appears that the CPTPP will be a useful and beneficial tool for both employers in Canada as well as prospective employees from member countries.

The information in this article is for general purposes only, and not intended as legal advice for any particular situation.

Categories
ImmPulse™ Newsletter

Clarity on Police Clearance Requirements for Permanent Residence Applications

There has at time been confusion about what period of time spent in a country after the age of 18 will necessitate the obtainment of a police clearance certificate for the purposes of a Canadian permanent residence application. Though the period has often been referred to as six months, it was not clear if that was a consecutive or cumulative six months.

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”) has now clarified that applicants for permanent residence must provide police clearance certificates for any country in which they have resided for six months or more in a row since the age of 18.

It may be also important to note that police clearances for a country where residing at the time of an application must be no more than six months old. Police clearances for countries where someone has previously lived must post-date their residency there (if the clearance shows as ‘expired’, it may still be accepted, and IRCC would advise if for any reason a new one must be secured).

The information in this article is for general purposes only, and not intended as legal advice for any particular situation.

Categories
ImmPulse™ Newsletter

Further Updates to Alberta ‘No LMIA’ List

In May 2017, we reported that Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) had partnered with the government of Alberta to disallow Labour Market Impact Assessments (LMIAs) to be issued for certain occupations (see http://www.kranclaw.com/2017/05/alberta-limits-positions-that-can-be-filled-by-foreign-workers/). Thereafter, in December 2017, we advised that the list had been updated (see http://www.kranclaw.com/2017/12/update-on-albertas-no-lmia-list/).

We now wish to note that the list of occupations ineligible for an LMIA in Alberta has been revised once again. At this time, LMIAs will not be processed for the following occupations in the province of Alberta:

NOC    Title

Management Occupations

0112    Human Resources Managers
0211    Engineering Managers

Business Finance and Administration Occupations

1215    Supervisors, supply chain, tracking and scheduling co-ordination occupations
1225    Purchasing agents and officers
1523    Production logistics co-ordinators

Natural and Applied Science and Related Occupations

2113    Geoscientists and oceanographers
2131    Civil engineers
2132    Mechanical engineers
2133    Electrical and electronic engineers
2212    Geological and mineral technologists and technicians
2231    Civil engineering technologists and technicians
2253    Drafting technologists and technicians

Trades, Transport and Equipment Operators and related occupations

7202    Contractors and supervisors, electrical trades/telecommunications occupations
7231    Machinists and machining and tooling inspectors
7237    Welders and related machine operators (except pressure/alloy welders)
7241    Electricians (except industrial and power system)
7242    Industrial electricians
7251    Plumbers
7271    Carpenters (except scaffolders)
7293    Insulators (except insulators)
7301    Contractors and supervisors, mechanic trades
7302    Contractors and supervisors, heavy equipment
7311    Industrial mechanics (except construction millwrights)
7312    Heavy-duty equipment mechanics
7322    Motor vehicle body repairers
7371    Crane operators (except all terrain crane operators)

Occupations in Manufacturing and Utilities

8222    Contractors and supervisors, oil and gas drilling and services
8232    Oil and gas well drillers, servicers, testers and related workers
8412    Oil and gas well drilling and related workers and services operators
8615    Oil and gas drilling, servicing and related labourers
9232    Petroleum, gas and chemical process operators

In addition, LMIAs will not be processed for the following occupations, where the work duration is greater than six months:

7021    Scaffolders
7237    Pressure/Alloy welders
7293    Insulators
7311    Construction Millwrights

We will continue to monitor this issue, and advise further as developments occur.

The information in this article is for general purposes only, and not intended as legal advice for any particular situation.

Categories
ImmPulse™ Newsletter

Mergers and Acquisitions: The Immigration Consequences for Employers with Foreign Workers in Canada

Corporations merge. Corporations divide. It’s all part of the ‘circle of corporate life’.

However, when a corporate restructuring of any kind occurs, there may be consequences employers of foreign workers that were part of the previous entity/entities, and are now (or now are sought to be) part of the new entity/entities. It is imperative, particularly in today’s Canadian immigration environment, that immigration consequences in any corporate transaction be considered along with all other issues, lest there be extreme negative consequences for both employers and employees. Among other issues, a corporate buyer could find itself without the right to use the services of the foreign workers in the corporation it just purchased – and those foreign workers could be key.

This is an extremely complex topic, but in this article, we will try highlight some issues of concern in connection with the subject at hand.

Mergers and Acquisitions

To breakdown the considerations in this area, we need to look at two issues.

  • Firstly, we must look at whether there is, and who is, the ‘Successor in Interest’.
  • Secondly, we must look at the consequences based on the foreign workers’ type of work
    Work permits can be based on various categories including Labour Market Impact Assessments (LMIAs), intra-company transfers, or other non-intra-company LMIA exemptions.
  • Successor in Interest

From Immigration Canada’s point of view, the consequences for foreign workers after a corporate merger/transaction, depend in large part on whether there is, and who is, the ‘Success in Interest’ (SII). An SII is a corporation which can show that it has substantially assumed the interest and obligations, assets and liabilities of the original corporation, and continues to operate the same business.

As will be elaborated upon below, this will have different consequences when there is a share purchase vs. an asset purchase.

  • Work Permit Type

With the knowledge of Immigration’s Canada concern about who the SII is, we must now look at a further breakdown, and consider the types of work permits that foreign workers may hold.

                    (i)         LMIA-Based Work Permits

In the case of an LMIA, these are issued to specific companies for specific positions. So, if a foreign worker continues to work with an SII, he/she can continue to be employed. However, there is a caveat in that the LMIA and work permit will need to be amended to reflect any new name or entity. Failure to properly amend could put employer and/or employee in violation of Canadian immigration law.

Of course, where the new company is not an SII, this reasoning will not be applicable. This could happen, for instance, where only a portion of a business is purchased (most notably in an asset transaction).

                    (ii)        Intra-Company Transfers

In the case of an intra-company transfer, the question becomes, essentially, ‘does the foreign worker still have somewhere to return to?’ That is, an intra-company transfer is premised on the belief that the person comes from an affiliate abroad, and is expected to return there (subject to various rules concerning later obtainment of permanent residence, etc.). If the transaction changes this reality, then the foreign employee is no longer entitled to an intra-company based work permit. The issue will be predicated on the nature of the transaction.

Again, this can become complex, but let’s look at two scenarios.

  • A foreign company ‘A-Co Global’ (which has a Canadian subsidiary, ‘A-Co Canada’), is bought by another foreign company ‘B-Co Global’ in a share transaction. If the structure of A-Co Global remains in tact, and all that has happened is that B-Co Global has purchased the shares of A-Co Global, then nothing has changed. The intra-company transferee from A-Co Global to A-Co Canada can still go back to A-Co Global.
  • The Canadian subsidiary only (‘X-Co Canada’) of foreign company ‘X-Co U.K.’, is bought by Canadian company ‘Y-Co.’ The link between X-Co Canada and X-Co U.K. is broken. A foreign worker transferred from X-Co U.K. to X-Co Canada no longer can return to X-Co U.K. This may mean that the foreign worker is no longer eligible to be an intra-company transferee.

As can be seen in just these two brief descriptions, these situations can become complex quickly, and certainly, there are many more caveats and pitfalls beyond just what these two examples show.

                    (iii)       Other Non-LMIA Foreign Workers

In the case of other non-LMIA work permits (e.g. NAFTA professionals), the issue comes down more or less to the question of Successor in Interest as canvassed above. The foreign worker, presuming he/she is still qualified, may continue to work with any SII. There is again the caveat though that any work permit must be amended to reflect the new name/entity.

Spin-Offs

Spin-offs are another topic, and there are certainly consequences in this scenario as well for foreign workers, and their employers. Based on the discussions above, it can already be seen that issues about things like where intra-company transferees would return, can arise, and otherwise, generally, issues relating to who the SII is. As such, here too, proper immigration planning must be undertaken.

Summary

Yet again, and as can be seen, the consequences of what happens to – often vital – foreign workers when a corporation’s character chances, can be significant. Certainly, appropriate legal advice should be sought for specific scenarios, and it should also be noted that the consequences in Canada may be different from those in other countries. It is therefore simply impossible to rely on knowledge from other countries’ systems to determine what actions should be considered in Canada.

The information in this article is for general purposes only, and not intended as legal advice for any particular situation.

Categories
ImmPulse™ Newsletter

Update on Alberta’s ‘No LMIA’ List

In May of 2017, we reported that Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) had partnered with the government of Alberta to disallow Labour Market Impact Assessments (LMIAs) to be issued for certain occupations (see http://www.kranclaw.com/2017/05/alberta-limits-positions-that-can-be-filled-by-foreign-workers/).

The list of occupations ineligible for an LMIA has now been revised.

The following occupations have been removed from the list (i.e. LMIAs can now be issued for these jobs):

 

 

NOC                Occupation

2233                Industrial engineering and manufacturing technologists and technicians

2261                Non-destructive testers and inspection technicians

7511                Transport truck drivers

 

 

The following occupations have now been added to the list (i.e. LMIAs can now not be issued for these jobs):

NOC                Occupation

112                  Human resources managers

211                  Engineering managers

1215                Supervisors, supply chain, tracking and scheduling co-ordination occupations

2113                Geoscientists and oceanographers

2253                Drafting technologists and technicians

7293                Insulators

7371                Crane Operators

 

 

The resultant current list of ineligible occupations, as recompiled, can be found at https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/services/foreign-workers/refusal.html.

 

The information in this article is for general purposes only, and not intended as legal advice for any particular situation.